Deakin University
Browse

Different thermal analysis technique application in determination of fold surface-free energy

Version 2 2024-06-17, 12:38
Version 1 2015-07-29, 08:06
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 12:38 authored by MM Abolhasani, M Rezaei Abadchi, K Magniez, Q Guo
In this work, the crystallization rates and spherulitic growth rate of miscible blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and acrylic rubber (ACM) were determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), real-time FTIR, and optical microscopy. FTIR results suggest that blending does not induce the creation of polymorphic crystalline forms of PVDF. SAXS data demonstrate the formation of interlamellar structure after blending. The fold surface-free energy (σ e) was analyzed and compared using different thermal analysis techniques. The isothermal crystallization curves obtained using real-time FTIR and DSC explored in two different methods: t 1/2 or Avrami equation. While the Avrami equation is more widespread and precise, both analytical methods gave similar free energy of folding values. However, it was found that the direct optical method of measuring spherulitic growth rate yields σ e values 30-50 % lower than those obtained from the overall crystallization rate data. Conversely, the σ e values were found to increase with increasing amorphous ACM phase content regardless of the analytical methods.

History

Journal

Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry

Volume

119

Pagination

527-536

Location

New York, N.Y.

ISSN

1388-6150

eISSN

1588-2926

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2015, Springer

Issue

1

Publisher

Springer