File(s) under permanent embargo
Do common dispersal influences inform a large lizard’s landscape-scale gene flow?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-03, 01:29 authored by Tim Jessop, P Smissen, JR Anson, Craig ShermanCraig Sherman, JM SumnerThe dispersal tendencies of individuals can provide an important adaptive basis to counter environmental and ecological variation to increase fitness and benefit populations. We evaluated whether indirect genetic-based measures of dispersal of a large monitor lizard (Varanus varius) were sex-biased and further covaried with putative demographic and ecological differences across a forest ecotone in Southern Australia. The mean corrected assignment index (i.e., mAIC) estimated that lace monitors had significant male-biased dispersal. There was strong evidence that common dispersal promoting influences, including lace monitor density and arboreal mammal prey availability, but not the overall male-biased sex ratio, differed with forest type across the ecotone. These different forest types influenced the extent of sex-biased dispersal, with lace monitors captured in banksia woodland having a significant male bias in dispersal, whilst lace monitors sampled in adjacent eucalypt forest showed no difference in assignment values indicating no sex-biased dispersal. However, individual-based spatial autocorrelation analyses and mixed effect models indicated no spatial mediated genetic structuring nor evidence of sex or habitat-related effects. Estimates of recent migration (i.e., < 3 generations) indicated strong and symmetrical migration between banksia woodland and eucalypt forest patches suggesting limited habitat resistance to gene flow across an ecotonal landscape. Not discounting method-specific evidence for male- and forest-type-biased dispersal, the absence of spatial genetic structuring suggests lace monitors retain a high dispersal capacity. An absence of landscape-scale genetic structure is consistent with this species’s high vagility. This landscape-scale result is further supported because only the most significant biogeographic barriers (e.g., mountain ranges) impede gene flow within the species’ extensive range distribution, allowing for genetic structuring among populations.
History
Journal
Evolutionary EcologyVolume
36Pagination
987-1006Location
Berlin, GermanyPublisher DOI
ISSN
0269-7653eISSN
1573-8477Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalIssue
6Publisher
SpringerUsage metrics
Keywords
Adaptive dispersalCONSEQUENCESEcologyEcotoneEnvironmental Sciences & EcologyEvolutionary BiologyGene flowGenetics & HeredityGeographic structuringLACE MONITORSLandscape resource gradientsLARGE CARNIVOROUS LIZARDLife Sciences & BiomedicinePOPULATION-STRUCTUREReptileScience & TechnologySEX-BIASED DISPERSALSNAKESOFTWARESPATIAL AUTOCORRELATIONTERRESTRIALVARANIDAEVaranus variusGenetics15 Life on LandSchool of Life and Environmental SciencesCentre for Integrative EcologyFaculty of Science Engineering and Built EnvironmentEvolutionary BiologyEcology
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC