File(s) under permanent embargo
Do drivers intentionally target wildlife on roads?
journal contribution
posted on 2012-08-01, 00:00 authored by Christa BeckmannChrista Beckmann, R ShineDespite frequent reliance on surveys to document public attitudes towards conservation issues (such as invasive-species control), only rarely do researchers assess the validity of statements made by the public in response to such surveys. Therefore, how well responses match actual behaviour remains an open question. We conducted a survey asking drivers if they had seen and/or run over (intentionally or not) snakes, native frogs or invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) on roads in the Northern Territory of Australia. To compare actual driver behaviour to the survey responses, we also carried out field experiments where we quantified the rates at which model snakes, frogs and toads (and controls) were run over on a rural highway. Our results show a discrepancy between survey responses and driver behaviour: for example, 25% of the people we surveyed indicated that they intentionally run over cane toads, yet field experiments showed that model toads were run over no more frequently than expected by chance, or than any other type of model.
History
Journal
Austral ecologyVolume
37Issue
5Pagination
629 - 632Publisher
Wiley - Blackwell Publishing AsiaLocation
Richmond, Vic.ISSN
1442-9985eISSN
1442-9993Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2011, The AuthorsUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC