Do video or telephone consultations impact attendance rates in an addiction medicine specialist outpatient clinic?

AbstractBackgroundEffective alcohol and other drugs (AODs) treatment has been proven to increase productivity and reduce costs to the community. Telehealth has previously been proven effective at delivering AOD treatment in the right settings. Yet, Australia's current Medicare funding restricts telephone consultations.AimWe hypothesise that treatment modality influences attendance rates. Specifically, telephone consultations can remove barriers to accessing treatment and, therefore, can increase attendance.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective audit on our addiction medicine specialist outpatient service from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023. A mixed‐effects logistic regression model was used to analyse factors associated with attendance rates.ResultsThere were 576 participants in the study, and 3354 appointments were booked over the 12‐month study period. Of these, 2695 were face‐to‐face, 541 were telephone and 118 were video. The unadjusted raw attendance rate was highest in the telephone group (87.24%), followed by face‐to‐face (73.02%) and video (44.92%). After adjusting for covariates, telephone consultation was associated with significantly increased odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (odds ratio (OR) = 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90–3.54, P < 0.001). Video consultation was associated with a 69% reduction in the odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.019–0.49, P < 0.001).ConclusionsWhile physical attendance may be required for specific clinical care, telephone consultations are associated with increased attendance and can form an important adjunct to delivering addiction treatment. Given the substantial costs of substance use disorders, this could inform government policies and funding priorities to further improve access and treatment outcomes.