File(s) under permanent embargo
Economic analysis of desalination technologies in the context of carbon pricing, and opportunities for membrane distillation
journal contribution
posted on 2013-08-15, 00:00 authored by U K Kesieme, Nick MilneNick Milne, H Aral, C Y Cheng, M DukeThe economics of membrane distillation (MD) and common seawater desalination methods including multi effect distillation (MED), multistage flash (MSF) and reverse osmosis (RO) are compared. MD also has the opportunity to enhance RO recovery, demonstrated experimentally on RO concentrate from groundwater. MD concentrated RO brine to 361,000mg/L total dissolved solids, an order of magnitude more saline than typical seawater, validating this potential. On a reference 30,000m3/day plant, MD has similar economics with other thermal desalination techniques, but RO is more cost effective. With the inclusion of a carbon tax of $23 per tonne carbon in Australia, RO remained the economically favourable process. However, when heat comes at a cost equivalent of 10% of the value of the steam needed for MD and MED, under a carbon tax regime, the cost of MD reduces to $0.66/m3 which is cheaper than RO and MED. The favour to MD was due to lower material cost. On low thermally, high electrically efficient installations MD can desalinate water from low temperature (<50°C) heat sources at a cost of $0.57/m3. Our assessment has found that generally, MD opportunities occur when heat is available at low cost, while extended recovery of RO brine is also viable. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
History
Journal
DesalinationVolume
323Pagination
66 - 74Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
0011-9164Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2013, Elsevier B.V.Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC