Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial costutility analysis
Version 3 2024-06-19, 12:53Version 3 2024-06-19, 12:53
Version 2 2024-06-03, 12:50Version 2 2024-06-03, 12:50
Version 1 2023-02-28, 01:05Version 1 2023-02-28, 01:05
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-19, 12:53authored byYY Lee, Cathy MihalopoulosCathy Mihalopoulos, ML Chatterton, SL Fletcher, P Chondros, K Densley, E Murray, C Dowrick, A Coe, KL Hegarty, SK Davidson, C Wachtler, VJ Palmer, JM Gunn
Background
Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
Methods and findings
A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months.
Conclusions
Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459).