Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Educating juries or telling them what to think? Credibility, delay in complaint, judicial directions and the role of juries

journal contribution
posted on 2017-01-01, 00:00 authored by Marilyn McMahonMarilyn McMahon, J Willis
The jury is endorsed for bringing community values into the legal system. However, there is considerable mistrust of juries in the trials of sexual offences and judicial directions have been a major strategy utilised to correct juror biases and erroneous beliefs. This has been very evident where complainants have delayed in reporting the alleged offence. Traditionally, common law judicial directions on this issue had the effect of protecting the accused; by contrast, more recent statutory reforms have been designed principally to protect complainants. These statutory reforms were introduced to counter anti-complainant, pro-defendant beliefs and have been adopted in varying forms throughout Australia. They have been most extensively (and problematically) developed in Victoria where they are given by the trial judge for the express purpose of educating juries and hence assisting them in their decision-making. This development raises important issues. Requiring the trial judge to give directions that can be seen as pro-complainant, and hence pro-prosecution, can create the appearance of a judge who is not impartial. Secondly, such directions present views on factual matters, an area that has conventionally been seen as the exclusive province of the jury. Additionally, the Victorian legislation has been interpreted as permitting, if not requiring that a trial judge suggest to the jury reasons for the delay in reporting even if such reasons have not been given by the complainant. This tends to blur the conventional distinction between the roles of judge and jury and involves the trial judge in the actual business of fact-finding. Finally, the Victorian developments cast doubt on the very legitimacy of the jury in the criminal justice system. These are matters of real concern that, at the very least, need explicit acknowledgement and careful examination.

History

Journal

Criminal law journal

Volume

41

Issue

1

Pagination

27 - 49

Publisher

Thomson Reuters

Location

Rozelle, N.S.W.

ISSN

0314-1160

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal article

Copyright notice

2017, Thomson Reuters

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC