Deakin University
Browse

Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials The International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group

Version 2 2024-06-05, 02:04
Version 1 2019-01-16, 14:48
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-05, 02:04 authored by Ewelina Rogozinska, Nadine Marlin, Ana Pilar Betran, Arne Astrup, Annick Bogaerts, Jose G Cecatti, Roland Devlieger, Jodie M Dodd, Nermeen El Beltagy, Fabio Facchinetti, Nina RW Geiker, Kym J Guelfi, Lene AH Haakstad, Cheryce L Harrison, Hans Hauner, Dorte M Jensen, Tarja I Kinnunen, Janette Khoury, Riitta Luoto, Fionnuala McAuliffe, Narges Motahari, Siv Morkved, Julie OwensJulie Owens, Maria Perales, Elisabetta Petrella, Suzanne Phelan, Lucilla Poston, Kathrin Rauh, Kristina M Renault, Linda R Sagedal, Kjell A Salvesen, Garry X Shen, Alexis Shub, Tania Scudeller, Fernanda G Surita, Signe N Stafne, Helena Teede, Serena Tonstad, Mireille NM van Poppel, Christina A Vinter, Ingvild Vistad, SeonAe Yeo, Julie Dodds, Sally Kerry, Louise Jackson, Pelham Barton, Emma Molyneaux, Alba A Martin, Girish Rayanagoudar, Anneloes E Ruifrok, Tracy Roberts, Christianne JM de Groot, Arri Coomarasamy, Ben WJ Mol, Javier Zamora, Khalid S Khan, Richard D Riley, Shakila Thangaratinam
AbstractObjectiveTo synthesise the evidence on the overall and differential effects of interventions based on diet and physical activity during pregnancy, primarily on gestational weight gain and maternal and offspring composite outcomes, according to women’s body mass index, age, parity, ethnicity, and pre-existing medical condition; and secondarily on individual complications.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD).Data sourcesMajor electronic databases from inception to February 2017 without language restrictions.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesRandomised trials on diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy.Data synthesisStatistical models accounted for clustering of participants within trials and heterogeneity across trials leading to summary mean differences or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the effects overall, and in subgroups (interactions).ResultsIPD were obtained from 36 randomised trials (12 526 women). Less weight gain occurred in the intervention group than control group (mean difference −0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval −0.92 to −0.48 kg, I2=14.1%; 33 studies, 9320 women). Although summary effect estimates favoured the intervention, the reductions in maternal (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.03, I2=26.7%; 24 studies, 8852 women) and offspring (0.94, 0.83 to 1.08, I2=0%; 18 studies, 7981 women) composite outcomes were not statistically significant. No evidence was found of differential intervention effects across subgroups, for either gestational weight gain or composite outcomes. There was strong evidence that interventions reduced the odds of caesarean section (0.91, 0.83 to 0.99, I2=0%; 32 studies, 11 410 women), but not for other individual complications in IPD meta-analysis. When IPD were supplemented with study level data from studies that did not provide IPD, the overall effect was similar, with stronger evidence of benefit for gestational diabetes (0.76, 0.65 to 0.89, I2=36.8%; 59 studies, 16 885 women).ConclusionDiet and physical activity based interventions during pregnancy reduce gestational weight gain and lower the odds of caesarean section. There is no evidence that effects differ across subgroups of women.

History

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL

Volume

358

Article number

ARTN j3119

Pagination

1 - 18

Location

England

ISSN

1756-1833

eISSN

1756-1833

Language

English

Notes

This article has a correction. Please see: https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j3991

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2017, The Author(s)

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP