File(s) under permanent embargo
Effect of gender on evidence-based practice for Australian patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective multi-site study
journal contribution
posted on 2017-05-01, 00:00 authored by L Kuhn, Karen Page, Maryann StreetMaryann Street, John Rolley, Julie ConsidineJulie ConsidineBackground: Early acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care occurs in the emergency department (ED). Death and disability from ACS are reduced with access to evidence-based ACS care. In this study, we aimed to explore if gender influenced access to ACS care.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted for 288 (50% women, n = 144) randomly selected adults with ACS admitted via the ED to three tertiary public hospitals in Victoria, Australia from 1.1.2013 to 30.6.2015.
Results: Compared with men, women were older (79 vs 75.5 years; p = 0.009) less often allocated triage category 2 (58.3 vs 71.5%; p = 0.026) and waited longer for their first electrocardiograph (18.5 vs 15 min;p = 0.001). Fewer women were admitted to coronary care units (52.4 vs 65.3%; p = 0.023), but were more often admitted to general medicine units (39.6 vs 22.9%; p = 0.003) than men. The median length of stay was 4 days for both genders, but women were admitted for significantly more bed days than men (IQR3–7 vs 2–5; p = 0.005).
Conclusions: There were a number of gender differences in ED care for ACS and women were at greater risk of variation from evidence-based guidelines. Further research is needed to understand why gender differences exist in ED ACS care.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted for 288 (50% women, n = 144) randomly selected adults with ACS admitted via the ED to three tertiary public hospitals in Victoria, Australia from 1.1.2013 to 30.6.2015.
Results: Compared with men, women were older (79 vs 75.5 years; p = 0.009) less often allocated triage category 2 (58.3 vs 71.5%; p = 0.026) and waited longer for their first electrocardiograph (18.5 vs 15 min;p = 0.001). Fewer women were admitted to coronary care units (52.4 vs 65.3%; p = 0.023), but were more often admitted to general medicine units (39.6 vs 22.9%; p = 0.003) than men. The median length of stay was 4 days for both genders, but women were admitted for significantly more bed days than men (IQR3–7 vs 2–5; p = 0.005).
Conclusions: There were a number of gender differences in ED care for ACS and women were at greater risk of variation from evidence-based guidelines. Further research is needed to understand why gender differences exist in ED ACS care.
History
Journal
Australasian emergency nursing journalVolume
20Issue
2Pagination
63 - 68Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
1574-6267Language
EngPublication classification
C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2017 College of Emergency Nursing AustralasiaUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Acute coronary syndromeEmergency departmentEmergency nursingEvidence-based practiceMyocardial infarctionScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineNursingACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTIONNATIONAL-HEART-FOUNDATIONNEW-ZEALAND GUIDELINESSOCIETY-OF-AUSTRALIASYMPTOM PRESENTATIONCARDIAC-SOCIETYSEX-DIFFERENCESCARE UNITMANAGEMENTWOMEN
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC