File(s) not publicly available
Effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation delivery modes on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-09, 03:49 authored by Teketo TegegneTeketo Tegegne, Jonathan RawstornJonathan Rawstorn, Rebecca NourseRebecca Nourse, Kelemu KibretKelemu Kibret, K Y Ahmed, Ralph MaddisonRalph MaddisonBackground This review aimed to compare the relative effectiveness of different exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) delivery modes (centre-based, home-based, hybrid and technology-enabled ExCR) on key heart failure (HF) outcomes: exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), HF-related hospitalisation and HF-related mortality. Methods and results Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published through 20 June 2021 were identified from six databases, and reference lists of included studies. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R. Continuous and binary outcomes are reported as mean differences (MD) and ORs, respectively, with 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). One-hundred and thirty-nine RCTs (n=18 670) were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis demonstrated improvements in VO 2 peak following centre-based (MD (95% CrI)=3.10 (2.56 to 3.65) mL/kg/min), home-based (MD=2.69 (1.67 to 3.70) mL/kg/min) and technology-enabled ExCR (MD=1.76 (0.27 to 3.26) mL/kg/min). Similarly, 6 min walk distance was improved following hybrid (MD=84.78 (31.64 to 138.32) m), centre-based (MD=50.35 (30.15 to 70.56) m) and home-based ExCR (MD=36.77 (12.47 to 61.29) m). Incremental shuttle walk distance did not improve following any ExCR delivery modes. Minnesota living with HF questionnaire improved after centre-based (MD=-10.38 (-14.15 to-6.46)) and home-based ExCR (MD=-8.80 (-13.62 to-4.07)). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire was improved following home-based ExCR (MD=20.61 (4.61 to 36.47)), and Short Form Survey 36 mental component after centre-based ExCR (MD=3.64 (0.30 to 6.14)). HF-related hospitalisation and mortality risks reduced only after centre-based ExCR (OR=0.41 (0.17 to 0.76) and OR=0.42 (0.16 to 0.90), respectively). Mean age of study participants was only associated with changes in VO 2 peak. Conclusion ExCR programmes have broader benefits for people with HF and since different delivery modes were comparably effective for improving exercise capacity and HRQoL, the selection of delivery modes should be tailored to individuals' preferences.
History
Journal
Open HeartVolume
9Publisher DOI
ISSN
2398-595XeISSN
2053-3624Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Science & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineCardiac & Cardiovascular SystemsCardiovascular System & CardiologyHOME-BASED EXERCISEPRESERVED EJECTION FRACTIONNATRIURETIC PEPTIDE EXPRESSIONDISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMTAI CHI EXERCISESKELETAL-MUSCLEOLDER PATIENTSPHYSICAL-ACTIVITYCONTROLLED-TRIALFUNCTIONAL-CAPACITYcardiac rehabilitationepidemiologyheart failuremeta-analysisoutcome assessment, health care
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC