Deakin University
Browse
laws-empoweringprimary-2008.pdf (129.26 kB)

Engaging patients, clinicians and health funders in weight management: the Counterweight Programme

Download (129.26 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2008-12-01, 00:00 authored by M McQuigg, J E Brown, J I Broom, Rachel LawsRachel Laws, J P D Reckless, P A Noble, S Kumar, E L McCombie, M E J Lean, G F Lyons, S Mongia, G S Frost, M F Quinn, J H Barth, S M Haynes, N Finer, D W Haslam, H M Ross, D J Hole, S Radziwonik
Background. The Counterweight Programme provides an evidence based and effective approach for weight management in routine primary care. Uptake of the programme has been variable for practices and patients.

Aim. To explore key barriers and facilitators of practice and patient engagement in the Counterweight Programme and to describe key strategies used to address barriers in the wider implementation of this weight management programme in UK primary care.

Methods. All seven weight management advisers participated in a focus group. In-depth interviews were conducted with purposeful samples of GPs (n = 7) and practice nurses (n = 15) from 11 practices out of the 65 participating in the programme. A total of 37 patients participated through a mixture of in-depth interviews (n = 18) and three focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were analysed for key themes that emerged.

Results. Engagement of practice staff was influenced by clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes, factors relating to the way the programme was initiated and implemented, the programme content and organizational/contextual factors. Patient engagement was influenced by practice endorsement of the programme, clear understanding of programme goals, structured proactive follow-up and perception of positive outcomes.

Conclusions. Having a clear understanding of programme goals and expectations, enhancing self-efficacy in weight management and providing proactive follow-up is important for engaging both practices and patients. The widespread integration of weight management programmes into routine primary care is likely to require supportive public policy.

History

Journal

Family practice

Volume

25

Issue

Supplement 1

Pagination

i79 - i86

Publisher

Oxford Journals

Location

Oxford, Eng.

ISSN

0263-2136

eISSN

1460-2229

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2008, Oxford Journals

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC