Erratum: Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (Journal of Physical Chemistry (2019) DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719001314)
Version 2 2024-06-06, 05:01
Version 1 2023-02-01, 04:30
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-06, 05:01 authored by Y Wu, B Levis, KE Riehm, N Saadat, AW Levis, M Azar, DB Rice, J Boruff, P Cuijpers, S Gilbody, JPA Ioannidis, LA Kloda, D McMillan, SB Patten, I Shrier, RC Ziegelstein, DH Akena, B Arroll, L Ayalon, HR Baradaran, M Baron, CH Bombardier, Peter ButterworthPeter Butterworth, G Carter, MH Chagas, JCN Chan, R Cholera, Y Conwell, JM De Manvan Ginkel, JR Fann, FH Fischer, D Fung, B Gelaye, F Goodyear-Smith, CG Greeno, BJ Hall, PA Harrison, M Härter, U Hegerl, L Hides, SE Hobfoll, M Hudson, T Hyphantis, M Inagaki, N Jetté, ME Khamseh, KM Kiely, Y Kwan, F Lamers, SI Liu, M Lotrakul, SR Loureiro, B Löwe, A McGuire, S Mohd-Sidik, TN Munhoz, K Muramatsu, FL Osório, V Patel, BW Pence, P Persoons, A Picardi, K Reuter, AG Rooney, IS Santos, J Shaaban, A Sidebottom, A Simning, L Stafford, S Sung, PLL Tan, Alyna TurnerAlyna Turner, HC Van Weert, J White, MA Whooley, K Winkley, M Yamada, A Benedetti, BD ThombsErratum: Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (Journal of Physical Chemistry (2019) DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719001314)
