Establishment of judicial commissions in Malaysia and Bangladesh to strengthen the constitutional process of appointment of the higher judiciary: a comparative study
Version 2 2024-06-17, 20:51Version 2 2024-06-17, 20:51
Version 1 2016-11-16, 13:46Version 1 2016-11-16, 13:46
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 20:51authored byME Bari, J Shamsuddin
In order to strengthen the constitutional process of appointment of judges in Superior Courts, Malaysia by enacting an Act in 2009 established the Judicial Appointments Commission and Bangladesh established a Supreme Judicial Commission in 2008 by promulgating an Ordinance. This Act/Ordinance was neither passed/ promulgated in pursuance of any provisions of the Constitution nor by introducing any amendment to the provisions of the Constitution. The recommendations of the both the Commissions were not given binding force on the executive. The power of the executive to accept or reject the candidates recommended by the Judicial Appointments Commission/Supreme Judicial Commission at his pleasure defeats the very objective of establishing the Commission for appointing the most competent and suitable persons as judges of the superior courts in Malaysia and Bangladesh.
History
Journal
Journal of Malaysian and comparative law
Volume
40
Pagination
87-107
Location
Malaysia
ISSN
0126-6322
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal article