Deakin University
Browse

Euthanasia: why it doesn`t matter (much) what the doctor thinks and why there is no suggestion that doctors should have a duty to kill

Version 2 2024-06-17, 03:55
Version 1 2014-10-27, 16:27
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 03:55 authored by M Bagaric, K Amarasekara
A major reason that The Netherlands has taken a different approach to the rest of the world on such a fundamental moral issue is that the courts and legislature in that country have accorded the interests of doctors a cardinal role in the euthanasia debate. This article argues that the interests of doctors are of only incidental and peripheral relevance in relation to the moral status of euthanasia. The moral status of euthanasia has little to do with the
preparedness ofdoctors to administer the lethal injection or their general attitude towards the practice. Euthanasia is principally about the interests of the patient and the impact that the practice may have on the community in general, not preserving the conscience or improving the working life ofdoctors.

History

Journal

Journal of law and medicine

Volume

10

Pagination

221-231

Location

North Ryde, N.S.W

ISSN

1320-159X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

2

Publisher

Lawbook Co.

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC