Deakin University

File(s) under permanent embargo

Experienced meditators exhibit no differences to demographically matched controls in theta phase synchronization, P200, or P300 during an auditory oddball task

journal contribution
posted on 2020-03-01, 00:00 authored by J R Payne, O Baell, H Geddes, B Fitzgibbon, M Emonson, Aron HillAron Hill, N T Van Dam, G Humble, P B Fitzgerald, N W Bailey
Objectives: Long-term meditation practice affects the brain’s ability to sustain attention. However, how this occurs is not well understood. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies have found that during dichotic oddball listening tasks, experienced meditators displayed altered attention-related neural markers including theta phase synchronization (TPS) and event-related potentials (ERP; P200 and P300) to target tones while meditating compared to resting, and compared to non-meditators after intensive meditation interventions. Research is yet to establish whether the changes in the aforementioned neural markers are trait changes which may be observable in meditators irrespective of practice setting. Methods: The present study expanded on previous research by comparing EEG measures from a dichotic oddball task in a sample of community-based mindfulness meditators (n = 22) to healthy controls with no meditation experience (n = 22). To minimize state effects, neither group practiced meditation during/immediately prior to the EEG session. Results: No group differences were observed in behavioural performance or either the global amplitude or distribution of theta phase synchronization, P200 or P300. Bayes factor analysis suggested evidence against group differences for the P200 and P300. Conclusions: The results suggest that increased P200, P300, and TPS do not reflect trait-related changes in a community sample of mindfulness meditators. The present study used a larger sample size than previous research and power analyses suggested the study was sufficiently powered to detect differences. These results add nuance to our understanding of which processes are affected by meditation and the amount of meditation required to generate differences in specific neural processes.







643 - 659




New York, N.Y.







Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal