morss-factsthreats-2009.pdf (131.93 kB)
Download file

Facts, threats and reds : common law constitutionalism and the rule of law

Download (131.93 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2009-01-01, 00:00 authored by John MorssJohn Morss
In a concurring judgment in Thomas v Mowbray, a High Court of Australia case turning on the Constitutional validity of terrorism-related control orders, Callinan J offers a re-evaluation of the Court’s earlier decision in the Australian Communist Party case to curtail executive power. According to Callinan J, factual matters knowable (but not known) at the time of the earlier decision might have given rise to a different outcome. In a dissenting judgment by Kirby J in the same case the Court’s reasoning in the Australian Communist Party case is robustly defended. These contested issues connect with the theoretical dispute between ‘common law constitutionalism’ and ‘constitutional positivism’ analysed by Dyzenhaus in the context of states of emergency where the limits of executive action and the role of supporting facts become particularly salient. They press the question of the status of the rule of law in the international as well as in the municipal sphere.

History

Journal

Deakin law review

Volume

14

Issue

1

Pagination

79 - 98

Publisher

Deakin University

Location

Burwood, Vic.

ISSN

1321-3660

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Usage metrics

Categories

Exports