Fear and overprotection in Australian residential aged care facilities: the inadvertent impact of regulation on quality continence care
Version 2 2024-06-13, 16:54Version 2 2024-06-13, 16:54
Version 1 2015-10-05, 15:55Version 1 2015-10-05, 15:55
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 16:54authored byJ Ostaszkiewicz, B O'Connell, PL Dunning
Aim: Most residents in residential aged care facilities are incontinent. This study explored how continence care was provided in residential aged care facilities, and describes a subset of data about staffs' beliefs and experiences of the quality framework and the funding model on residents' continence care. Methods: Using grounded theory methodology, 18 residential aged care staff members were interviewed and 88 hours of field observations conducted in two facilities. Data were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive analytic procedures. Results: Staffs' beliefs and experiences about the requirements of the quality framework and the funding model fostered a climate of fear and risk adversity that had multiple unintended effects on residents' continence care, incentivising dependence on continence management, and equating effective continence care with effective pad use. Conclusion: There is a need to rethink the quality of continence care and its measurement in Australian residential aged care facilities.