Deakin University
Browse
heynsbergh-feasibilityuseability-2018.pdf (696.8 kB)

Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: A systematic review

Download (696.8 kB)
Version 3 2024-06-18, 07:21
Version 2 2024-06-04, 14:39
Version 1 2018-03-07, 07:59
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 07:21 authored by N Heynsbergh, L Heckel, Mari BottiMari Botti, Trish LivingstonTrish Livingston
BACKGROUND: Carers looking after someone with cancer often experience negative impacts on their own health. M-health interventions have been designed to provide information and support to patients and their carers. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for carers is less well understood. The objectives were to assess the feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions among carers of people living with cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the CINAHL, MEDLINE and PSYCINFO databases was performed using terms related to web-based interventions and smartphone applications, carers and cancer. Studies were included if a randomised controlled trial or pilot study was conducted, focused on adult carers looking after another adult with cancer and were published between January 2007-June 2017. Articles were excluded if they reported qualitative results only or were evaluating existing websites and applications. Feasibility was measured by attrition, recruitment rates and frequency of intervention use; useability was measured by the ease of intervention use and the role of features to minimise errors in use. Acceptability was measured by carers' perception of the appropriateness of the content and their ability to incorporate the intervention into their daily routines. RESULTS: Of the 729 articles, six articles met the inclusion criteria. Attrition ranged from 14% - 77%, recruitment rates from 20% - 66% and intervention useability varied across studies. Half of the studies implemented measures to improve useability. Overall, carers rated the content of the interventions as appropriate and reported improved knowledge and communication. Acceptability was further demonstrated as carers preferred the flexibility available with web-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Technology-based interventions are suitable for use among carers of people with cancer. Further research is required to fully assess the impact of technology as an information and support mechanism for carers.

History

Journal

BMC Cancer

Volume

18

Article number

ARTN 244

Pagination

1 - 11

Location

England

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1471-2407

eISSN

1471-2407

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2018, The Authors

Issue

1

Publisher

BMC