File(s) under permanent embargo
Fidelity to foraging sites after long migrations
journal contribution
posted on 2020-04-01, 00:00 authored by Takahiro Shimada, Colin J Limpus, Mark Hamann, Ian Bell, Nicole Esteban, Rachel Groom, Graeme HaysGraeme HaysPatterns of animal movement associated with foraging lie at the heart of many ecological studies and often animals face decisions of staying in an environment they know, versus relocating to new sites.
The lack of knowledge of new foraging sites means there is risk associated with a decision to relocate (e.g. poor foraging) as well as a potential benefit (e.g. improved foraging).
Using a unique long‐term satellite tracking dataset for several sea turtle species, combined with capture‐mark‐recapture (CMR) data extending over 50 years, we show how, across species, individuals generally maintain tight fidelity to specific foraging sites after extended (up to almost 10,000 km) migration to and from distant breeding sites as well as across many decades.
Migrating individuals often travelled through suitable foraging areas en route to their “home” site and so extended their journeys to maintain foraging site fidelity.
We explore the likely mechanistic underpinnings of this trait, which is also seen in some migrating birds, and suggest that individuals will forgo areas of suitable forage encountered en route during migration when they have poor knowledge of the long‐term suitability of those sites, making relocation to those sites risky.
The lack of knowledge of new foraging sites means there is risk associated with a decision to relocate (e.g. poor foraging) as well as a potential benefit (e.g. improved foraging).
Using a unique long‐term satellite tracking dataset for several sea turtle species, combined with capture‐mark‐recapture (CMR) data extending over 50 years, we show how, across species, individuals generally maintain tight fidelity to specific foraging sites after extended (up to almost 10,000 km) migration to and from distant breeding sites as well as across many decades.
Migrating individuals often travelled through suitable foraging areas en route to their “home” site and so extended their journeys to maintain foraging site fidelity.
We explore the likely mechanistic underpinnings of this trait, which is also seen in some migrating birds, and suggest that individuals will forgo areas of suitable forage encountered en route during migration when they have poor knowledge of the long‐term suitability of those sites, making relocation to those sites risky.
History
Journal
Journal of animal ecologyVolume
89Issue
4Pagination
1008 - 1016Publisher
WileyLocation
Chichester, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0021-8790eISSN
1365-2656Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Science & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineEcologyZoologyEnvironmental Sciences & EcologyArgosbiologgingCaretta carettaChelonia mydasEretmochelys imbricataFastloc-GPSNatator depressusrisk takingTURTLE CHELONIA-MYDASSEA-TURTLESDISTANCE MIGRATIONCARETTA-CARETTAHERVEY-BAYHOME-RANGEPATTERNSHABITATSEAGRASSTERM\nCaretta caretta\n\nChelonia mydas\n\nEretmochelys imbricata\n\nNatator depressus\n