Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under embargo

Fit for Purpose? The Suitability of Oral Health Outcome Measures to Inform Policy

Version 2 2024-06-02, 23:37
Version 1 2023-08-16, 05:34
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-02, 23:37 authored by Tan NguyenTan Nguyen, H Rogers, GD Taylor, Utsana TonmukayakulUtsana Tonmukayakul, C Lin, M Hall, H Calache, C Vernazza
Measuring outcomes for oral health is frequently undertaken using the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index. DMFT measures dental caries experience. As a condition-specific outcome, it is not relatable to consumers, nor does it capture the impact of dental caries on quality of life or outcomes that matter most to consumers. Efficient resource allocation should include patient values. It is crucial to use measurement instruments that record consumer values or preferences for oral health and oral diseases. These measures are often called patient-reported outcome measures and/or patient-reported experience measures. Outcome measures relevant to patients are recommended to influence and inform policy decision-making for oral health. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Oral health research and program evaluation should consider alternative outcome measures for population oral health other than the DMFT index.

History

Journal

JDR Clinical and Translational Research

Pagination

23800844231189997-

Location

United States

ISSN

2380-0844

eISSN

2380-0852

Language

en

Publication classification

C4 Letter or note

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC