File(s) under permanent embargo
Food insecurity screening procedures used in reproductive healthcare settings
Version 2 2023-08-17, 03:53
Version 1 2023-06-07, 02:09
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-17, 03:53 authored by Julia Zinga, Paige van der PligtPaige van der Pligt, Rebecca Lindberg, Vidanka VasilevskiVidanka Vasilevski, Amelia LeeAmelia Lee, Fiona McKayFiona McKayAbstract
Context
Food insecurity is an important determinant of health and should be identified by clinicians during routine reproductive healthcare. The procedures used in reproductive healthcare settings to identify people experiencing food insecurity have not been fully researched.
Objective
The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence from published studies that describe the procedures implemented by clinicians in healthcare settings to identify food insecurity in pregnant women, or women of reproductive age (15 years–49 years).
Data Sources
Four databases were searched in April 2022 to identify studies that met the eligibility criteria.
Data Extraction
Studies that used tools that were both validated or newly developed were considered, as were studies that incorporated food insecurity screening as part of a multidomain screening tool. Two authors completed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment independently.
Data Analysis
There were 1075 studies identified; after screening, 7 studies were included in the narrative synthesis, including studies relating to women who were pregnant or in the postpartum period; none of the included studies related to women in the preconception stage. Four screening tools were identified: 2- and 6-item tools specifically focused on food insecurity, a 58-item multidomain tool incorporating 4 food insecurity items, and a modified version of the 2-item tool. Methods of implementing screening varied across studies. Three described subsequent processes that supported food-insecure patients once identified.
Conclusion
Few published studies have investigated optimal screening tools and their implementation within reproductive healthcare settings to address food insecurity for this priority population group. Further research is required to determine: the optimal tool, preferable screening methods from the perspectives of both patients and clinicians, and potential strategies for implementation in countries outside of the United States. An additional evidence gap remains about referral pathways and appropriate supports for this population once food insecurity is identified.
Systematic Review Registration
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022319687.
History
Journal
Nutrition ReviewsPagination
nuad039-Location
United StatesPublisher DOI
ISSN
0029-6643eISSN
1753-4887Language
enPublisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC