Deakin University
Browse

Genetic diversity of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from environmental, animal and clinical sources in Malaysia

Download (1.22 MB)
Version 2 2024-06-13, 10:53
Version 1 2017-08-04, 12:53
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 10:53 authored by DS Daniel, SM Lee, HM Gan, GA Dykes, S Rahman
Enterococcus faecalis ranks as one of the leading causes of nosocomial infections. A strong epidemiological link has been reported between E. faecalis inhabiting animals and environmental sources. This study investigates the genetic diversity, antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants in E. faecalis from three sources in Malaysia. A total of 250 E. faecalis isolates were obtained consisting of 120 isolates from farm animals, 100 isolates from water sources and 30 isolates from hospitalized patients. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis-typing yielded 63 pulsotypes, with high diversity observed in all sources (D = ≥0.901). No pulsotype was common to all the three sources. Each patient room had its own unique PFGE pattern which persisted after six months. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Vancomycin, Gentamicin, Penicillin, Tetracycline, Nitrofurantoin, Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin and Fosfomycin were evaluated. Resistance to Tetracycline was most prevalent in isolates from farm animals (62%) and water sources (49%). Water isolates (86%) had a higher prevalence of the asa1 gene, which encodes for aggregation substance, whereas clinical (78%) and farm animal isolates (87%) had a higher prevalence of the esp gene, encoding a surface exposed protein. This study generates knowledge on the genetic diversity of E. faecalis with antibiotic resistance and virulence characteristics from various sources in Malaysia.

History

Journal

Journal of infection and public health

Volume

10

Pagination

617-623

Location

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1876-0341

eISSN

1876-035X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2017, The Authors

Issue

5

Publisher

Elsevier