Deakin University
Browse

Getting explicit about the implicit: a taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research

Version 2 2024-06-13, 10:23
Version 1 2017-01-30, 10:20
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 10:23 authored by EL Uhlmann, K Leavitt, JI Menges, J Koopman, M Howe, RE Johnson
Accumulated evidence from social and cognitive psychology suggests that many behaviors are driven by processes operating outside of awareness, and an array of implicit measures to capture such processes have been developed. Despite their potential application, implicit measures have received relatively modest attention within the organizational sciences, due in part to barriers to entry and uncertainty about appropriate use of available measures. The current article is intended to serve as an implicit measurement “toolkit” for organizational scholars, and as such our goals are fourfold. First, we present theory critical to implicit measures, highlighting advantages of capturing implicit processes in organizational research. Second, we present a functional taxonomy of implicit measures (i.e., accessibility-based, association-based, and interpretation-based measures) and explicate assumptions and appropriate use of each. Third, we discuss key criteria to help researchers identify specific implicit measures most appropriate for their own work, including a discussion of principles for the psychometric validation of implicit measures. Fourth, we conclude by identifying avenues for impactful “next-generation” research within the organizational sciences that would benefit from the use of implicit measures.

History

Journal

Organizational research methods

Volume

15

Pagination

553-601

Location

London, Eng.

ISSN

1094-4281

eISSN

1552-7425

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2012, The Author(s)

Issue

4

Publisher

SAGE Publications