File(s) not publicly available
Impact of assurance and assurer's professional affiliation on financial analysts' assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information
journal contribution
posted on 2011-08-01, 00:00 authored by G Pflugrath, P Roebuck, Roger SimnettRoger SimnettThis study reports the results of a behavioral experiment examining whether financial analysts from Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom perceive a difference in the credibility of stand-alone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports depending on whether they are assured, and the type of assurance provider (professional accountants versus sustainability consultants). We further examine whether the perceived credibility differs for financial analysts from the different countries and whether results hold for companies from different industries. The overall results show the credibility of a CSR report is greater when it is assured and when the assurer is a professional accountant. While assurance increases the credibility of the information in each of the three countries included, the relative impact is context-specific. Information is perceived to be more credible when a company is from an industry where assurance is more commonplace, and by financial analysts from the United States when the assurer is a professional accountant. Financial analysts from Australia and the United Kingdom perceive little difference in the enhanced credibility provided by the different assurance providers.
History
Journal
AuditingVolume
30Issue
3Pagination
239 - 254Publisher DOI
ISSN
0278-0380eISSN
1558-7991Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC