Deakin University
Browse

Improving the Quality of Electronic Medical Record Documentation: Development of a Compliance and Quality Program

Version 3 2024-10-19, 09:01
Version 2 2024-06-02, 14:43
Version 1 2023-02-10, 04:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-19, 09:01 authored by Rebecca JedwabRebecca Jedwab, M Franco, D Owen, A Ingram, B Redley, N Dobroff
Abstract Background Introducing an electronic medical record (EMR) system into a complex health care environment fundamentally changes clinical workflows and documentation processes and, hence, has implications for patient safety. After a multisite “big-bang” EMR implementation across our large public health care organization, a quality improvement program was developed and implemented to monitor clinician adoption, documentation quality, and compliance with workflows to support high-quality patient care. Objective Our objective was to report the development of an iterative quality improvement program for nursing, midwifery, and medical EMR documentation. Methods The Model for Improvement quality improvement framework guided cycles of “Plan, Do, Study, Act.” Steps included design, pre- and pilot testing of an audit tool to reflect expected practices for EMR documentation that examined quality and completeness of documentation 1-year post-EMR implementation. Analysis of initial audit results was then performed to (1) provide a baseline to benchmark comparison of ongoing improvement and (2) develop targeted intervention activities to address identified gaps. Results Analysis of 1,349 EMR record audits as a baseline for the first cycle of EMR quality improvement revealed five out of nine nursing and midwifery documentation components, and four out of ten medical documentation components' completion and quality were classified as good (>80%). Outputs from this work also included a framework for strategies to improve EMR documentation quality, as well as an EMR data dashboard to monitor compliance. Conclusion This work provides the foundation for the development of quality monitoring frameworks to inform both clinician and EMR optimization interventions using audits and feedback. Discipline-specific differences in performance can inform targeted interventions to maximize the effective use of resources and support longitudinal monitoring of EMR documentation and workflows. Future work will include repeat EMR auditing.

History

Journal

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volume

13

Pagination

836-844

Location

Germany

ISSN

1869-0327

eISSN

1869-0327

Language

en

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

4

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC