Deakin University
Browse

Incentive or deterrent: which encourages greater focus on health and safety in the Victorian construction industry?

journal contribution
posted on 2003-01-01, 00:00 authored by A Crosby, B Wood
The Australian Government commissioned a Royal Commission into the building industry in Australia that reported to Parliament in August 2002. Volume 6 of this report, released in February 2003, discussed certain aspects in occupational health and safety in Australia and leaned toward deterrents as a means of achieving reform. This research defines both incentives and deterrents used to increase awareness of, and improve safety on, building sites in Victoria, a state of Australia. A pilot survey questionnaire was developed following a literature review and industry employer representatives were invited to participate. Industry awareness of Government incentive programmes was found to be low, with less than a quarter stating they read Government strategies. One fund that provides actual research monies into health and safety was known to very few of the respondents. Of the employers surveyed, the majority agreed that financial fines do act as a valid deterrent. Increases in worker compensation premiums were seen as the greatest deterrent due to the effect on company overheads and thus competitive tendering bids. Deterrent programmes were more readily acknowledged by employers as they had an element of self promotion with employers attempting to avoid their application.<br>

History

Location

Ascot, England

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Journal

Construction information quarterly

Volume

5

Pagination

14 - 18

ISSN

1469-4891

Issue

4

Publisher

Chartered Institute of Building

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC