File(s) under permanent embargo
Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
journal contribution
posted on 2008-07-01, 00:00 authored by Crystal Man Ying Lee, Rachel HuxleyRachel Huxley, Rachel P Wildman, Mark WoodwardObjective: To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors.
Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately.
Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively.
Conclusion: Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women.
Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately.
Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively.
Conclusion: Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women.
History
Journal
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVolume
61Issue
7Pagination
646 - 653Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Philadelphia, Pa.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0895-4356Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2008, ElsevierUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
body mass indexcardiovascular risk factorsmeta-analysisobesityROC curvewaist-to-height ratioScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineHealth Care Sciences & ServicesPublic, Environmental & Occupational HealthBODY-MASS INDEXSIMPLE ANTHROPOMETRIC INDEXESTO-HEIGHT RATIOWAIST CIRCUMFERENCEMETABOLIC SYNDROMEASIAN POPULATIONSSHORT STATUREWOMENINDICATORSHYPERTENSION