Deakin University
Browse

Influence of infill patterns generated by cad and fdm 3d printer on surface roughness and tensile strength properties

Download (6.87 MB)
Version 2 2024-06-04, 11:39
Version 1 2021-08-17, 16:40
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 11:39 authored by ML Dezaki, MKAM Ariffin, A Serjouei, Ali ZolfagharianAli Zolfagharian, S Hatami, M Bodaghi
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a capable technology based on a wide range of parameters. The goal of this study is to make a comparison between infill pattern and infill density generated by computer-aided design (CAD) and FDM. Grid, triangle, zigzag, and concentric patterns with various densities following the same structure of the FDM machine were designed by CAD software (CATIA V5®). Polylactic acid (PLA) material was assigned for both procedures. Surface roughness (SR) and tensile strength analysis were conducted to examine their effects on dog-bone samples. Also, a finite element analysis (FEA) was done on CAD specimens to find out the differences between printing and simulation processes. Results illustrated that CAD specimens had a better surface texture compared to the FDM machine while tensile tests showed patterns generated by FDM were stronger in terms of strength and stiffness. In this study, samples with concentric patterns had the lowest average SR (Ra) while zigzag was the worst with the value of 6.27 µm. Also, the highest strength was obtained for concentric and grid samples in both CAD and FDM procedures. These techniques can be useful in producing highly complex sandwich structures, bone scaffolds, and various combined patterns to achieve an optimal condition.

History

Journal

Applied Sciences (Switzerland)

Volume

11

Article number

ARTN 7272

Pagination

1 - 17

Location

Basel, Switzerland

Open access

  • Yes

eISSN

2076-3417

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

16

Publisher

MDPI