Intelligence-led policing (ILP) is a managerial law enforcement model that seeks to
place crime intelligence at the forefront of decision-making. This model has been
widely adopted, at least notionally, in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada,
and Australia. Drawing on interviews with intelligence analysts from two Australian
state law enforcement agencies, this article contributes to the relatively small body of
literature that has examined ILP in practice. The article identifies three relational
themes that inhibit the successful implementation of ILP: analysts and data, analysts
and tools, and analysts and decision makers. Furthermore, it calls attention to the
need to better understand the structure and operations within law enforcement
agencies, including the similarities and differences among organizational units, in
order to better understand how these nuances shape the practice of ILP.