posted on 2025-10-06, 01:34authored byRayed Almasoudi, Abolfazl Baghbani, Hossam Abuel-Naga
Accurate prediction of soil–structure interface shear strength (τmax) is critical for reliable geotechnical design. This study combines experimental testing with interpretable machine learning to overcome the limitations of traditional empirical models and black-box approaches. Ninety large-displacement ring shear tests were performed on five sands and three interface materials (steel, PVC, and stone) under normal stresses of 25–100 kPa. The results showed that particle morphology, quantified by the regularity index (RI), and surface roughness (Rt) are dominant factors. Irregular grains and rougher interfaces mobilised higher τmax through enhanced interlocking, while smoother particles reduced this benefit. Harder surfaces resisted asperity crushing and maintained higher shear strength, whereas softer materials such as PVC showed localised deformation and lower resistance. These experimental findings formed the basis for a hybrid symbolic regression framework integrating Genetic Programming (GP) with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Fourier feature augmentation, and physics-informed constraints. Compared with multiple linear regression and other hybrid GP variants, the Physics-Informed Neural Fourier GP (PIN-FGP) model achieved the best performance (R2 = 0.9866, RMSE = 2.0 kPa). The outcome is a set of five interpretable and physics-consistent formulas linking measurable soil and interface properties to τmax. The study provides both new experimental insights and transparent predictive tools, supporting safer and more defensible geotechnical design and analysis.