Deakin University
Browse

Intrasaccular flow disruption for ruptured aneurysms: An international multicenter study

journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-15, 23:03 authored by JDB Diestro, M Dibas, N Adeeb, RW Regenhardt, JE Vranic, A Guenego, SV Lay, L Renieri, A Al Balushi, E Shotar, K Premat, K El Naamani, G Saliou, MA Möhlenbruch, I Lylyk, PM Foreman, JA Vachhani, V Zupančić, MU Hafeez, C Rutledge, H Rai, VM Tutino, S Mirshani, S Ghozy, P Harker, NM Alotaibi, JD Rabinov, Y Ren, CM Schirmer, O Goren, M Piano, AL Kuhn, C Michelozzi, S Elens, RM Starke, A Hassan, A Salehani, A Nguyen, J Jones, M Psychogios, J Spears, C Parra-Fariñas, M Bres Bullrich, M Mayich, MM Salem, JK Burkhardt, BT Jankowitz, RA Domingo, T Huynh, R Tawk, C Ulfert, B Lubicz, P Panni, AS Puri, G Pero, CJ Griessenauer, Hamed AsadiHamed Asadi, A Siddiqui, AF Ducruet, FC Albuquerque, R Du, P Kan, V Kalousek, P Lylyk, SR Boddu, CJ Stapleton, J Knopman, P Jabbour, S Tjoumakaris, F Clarençon, N Limbucci, MA Aziz-Sultan, HH Cuellar-Saenz, C Cognard, AB Patel, AA Dmytriw
BackgroundThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a novel intrasaccular flow disruptor tailored for bifurcation aneurysms. We aim to describe the degree of aneurysm occlusion at the latest follow-up, and the rate of complications of aneurysms treated with the WEB device stratified according to rupture status.MethodsOur data were taken from the WorldWideWeb Consortium, an international multicenter cohort including patients treated with the WEB device. Aneurysms were classified into two groups: ruptured and unruptured. We compared clinical and radiologic outcomes of both groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match according to age, gender, bifurcation, location, prior treatment, neck, height, dome width, daughter sac, incorporated branch, pretreatment antiplatelets, and last imaging follow-up.ResultsThe study included 676 patients with 691 intracranial aneurysms (529 unruptured and 162 ruptured) treated with the WEB device. The PSM analysis had 55 pairs. In both the unmatched (85.8% vs 84.3%, p=0.692) and matched (94.4% vs 83.3%, p=0.066) cohorts there was no significant difference in the adequate occlusion rate at the last follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences in both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the two groups. There was no documented aneurysm rebleeding after WEB device implantation.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in both the radiologic outcomes and complications between unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. Our findings support the feasibility of treatment of ruptured aneurysms with the WEB device.

History

Related Materials

Location

England

Language

en

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Journal

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volume

15

Pagination

844-850

ISSN

1759-8478

eISSN

1759-8486

Issue

9

Publisher

BMJ

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC