Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Kidney Health Australia - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment guideline recommendations for infection control for haemodialysis units

Version 2 2024-06-06, 08:18
Version 1 2018-10-26, 14:36
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-06, 08:18 authored by M Jardine, RJ Commons, JR de Zoysa, MG Wong, N Gilroy, J Green, B Henderson, RL Stuart, DJ Tunnicliffe, C van Eps, Eugene AthanEugene Athan
AIM: There is no national consensus on infection control in haemodialysis units in Australia and New Zealand. The primary aim of this guideline was to provide recommendations on screening for blood-borne viruses and multi-resistant organisms for dialysis units based on the available evidence. METHODS: The KHA-CARI overall approach to guideline development follows the GRADE framework. A facilitated workshop was conducted to ensure that patient and caregiver concerns were considered. The evidence from relevant medical databases on the impact of screening on detection and transmission rates, hospitalisation, mortality, and psychosocial, was reviewed and critically appraised. The guideline group made recommendations from the evidence available. RESULTS: The main guideline recommendations are: Dialysis units adopt a comprehensive approach that encompasses standard infection control precautions. Conduct routine surveillance for key blood-borne viruses and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conduct routine surveillance of individual levels of protection against hepatitis B for patients on haemodialysis. Use dedicated dialysis machines for HBV-infected patients. The evidence in totality was not found to support routine surveillance of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). Enhanced surveillance in light of the local risk of transmittable infectious agents should be considered by dialysis units. Very few studies have reported on the potential adverse effects of screening and associated practices. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on the potential benefits and adverse effects of screening and associated practices on clinical outcomes including infections prevented and health service delivery, and psychosocial domains for patients. Given the results of trials in the critical setting, the effectiveness of MRSA decolonisation in people receiving dialysis therapy warrants further research. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

History

Journal

Nephrology

Volume

24

Article number

nep.13511

Pagination

951-957

Location

Australia

ISSN

1320-5358

eISSN

1440-1797

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2018, Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology

Issue

9

Publisher

WILEY