Deakin University
Browse

Lapsed prospecting rights : "the custodian giveth and the custodian taketh away"? Palala Resources (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy

journal contribution
posted on 2016-01-01, 00:00 authored by Pieter BadenhorstPieter Badenhorst
The decision in Palala Resources (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy & others 2014 (6) SA 403 (GP) (‘Palala Resources’) brings clarity about the lapsing of a company’s prospecting right in terms of s 56(c) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (‘the MPRDA’) upon deregistration of the company, and highlights some of the features of a statutory prospecting right. Section 56(c) determines that a company’s prospecting right will lapse upon deregistration of the company if no prior application has been made, in terms of s 11(1) of the MPRDA, to the Director-General of the Department of Mineral Resources for consent to alienate or transfer the right (item 1 of the Ministerial delegation of 12 May 2004). The principles underlying the decision could also be applied to mining rights granted in terms of the MPRDA. By way of introduction, these rights are briefly sketched before the decision will be set out and discussed. It will be argued that the case shows that despite the public law nature of the MPRDA, there is the need for a proper private-law analysis of these statutory rights.

History

Journal

South African law journal

Volume

133

Pagination

37-50

Location

Cape Town, South Africa

ISSN

0258-2503

eISSN

1996-2177

Language

eng

Publication classification

C4 Letter or note

Copyright notice

2016, Juta Law Publishing

Issue

1

Publisher

Juta Law

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC