Learning to expect: Predicting sounds during movement is related to sensorimotor association during listening
Version 3 2024-06-18, 15:55Version 3 2024-06-18, 15:55
Version 2 2024-06-04, 10:44Version 2 2024-06-04, 10:44
Version 1 2019-07-22, 07:49Version 1 2019-07-22, 07:49
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 15:55 authored by JD Burgess, BP Major, Claire McneelClaire Mcneel, Gillian Clark, Jarrad LumJarrad Lum, Peter EnticottPeter Enticott© 2019 Burgess, Major, McNeel, Clark, Lum and Enticott. Sensory experiences, such as sound, often result from our motor actions. Over time, repeated sound-producing performance can generate sensorimotor associations. However, it is not clear how sensory and motor information are associated. Here, we explore if sensory prediction is associated with the formation of sensorimotor associations during a learning task. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants produced index and little finger-swipes on a bespoke device, generating novel sounds. ERPs were also obtained as participants heard those sounds played back. Peak suppression was compared to assess sensory prediction. Additionally, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used during listening to generate finger-motor evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs were recorded before and after training upon hearing these sounds, and then compared to reveal sensorimotor associations. Finally, we explored the relationship between these components. Results demonstrated that an increased positive-going peak (e.g., P2) and a suppressed negative-going peak (e.g., N2) were recorded during action, revealing some sensory prediction outcomes (P2: p = 0.050, (Formula presented.) = 0.208; N2: p = 0.001, (Formula presented.) = 0.474). Increased MEPs were also observed upon hearing congruent sounds compared with incongruent sounds (i.e., associated to a finger), demonstrating precise sensorimotor associations that were not present before learning (Index finger: p < 0.001, (Formula presented.) = 0.614; Little finger: p < 0.001, (Formula presented.) = 0.529). Consistent with our broad hypotheses, a negative association between the MEPs in one finger during listening and ERPs during performance of the other was observed (Index finger MEPs and Fz N1 action ERPs; r = −0.655, p = 0.003). Overall, data suggest that predictive mechanisms are associated with the fine-tuning of sensorimotor associations.
History
Journal
Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVolume
13Article number
ARTN 215Location
SwitzerlandPublisher DOI
Open access
- Yes
Link to full text
ISSN
1662-5161eISSN
1662-5161Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2019, Burgess, Major, McNeel, Clark, Lum and EnticottPublisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SAUsage metrics
Keywords
Science & TechnologySocial SciencesLife Sciences & BiomedicineNeurosciencesPsychologyNeurosciences & Neurologysensory predictionsensorimotor associationpredictive comparisonTMSEEGMISMATCH NEGATIVITYCORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITYSENSORY CONSEQUENCESCOROLLARY DISCHARGEMOTOR REACTIVATIONBASIC RESEARCHINVERSE MODELSUPPRESSIONPERCEPTIONADAPTATION3209 Neurosciences5202 Biological psychology5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC