liu-lifecycle-2006.pdf (871.62 kB)
Lifecycle cost and CO2 emission comparison of conventional and rationalized bridges
journal contribution
posted on 2006-01-01, 00:00 authored by Y Itoh, S Tsubouchi, I T Kim, Chunlu LiuChunlu LiuThe construction industry consumes a great deal of natural resources and energy in constructing, maintaining and demolishing their products such as buildings and bridges. These activities lead significant impacts on global and regional environments in addition to their economic expenses. In this research, the lifecycle cost (LCC) and lifecycle CO2 (LCCO2) emission of newly developed bridges, including the minimized girder, rationalized box-girder and rationalized truss bridges, are quantified and compared with those of the conventional I-girder, box-girder and truss bridges. It was found that the newly developed types of bridges have lower values in both LCC and LCCO2 than the corresponding conventional bridges do. The effects of span lengths on LCC and LCCO2 are studied for both conventional and rationalized bridges. The characteristics of LCC and LCCO2 are investigated over the lifecycle of a bridge including its construction, maintenance and replacement stages.
History
Journal
Journal of global environment engineeringVolume
11Pagination
45 - 58Publisher
Japan Society of Civil EngineersLocation
Tokyo, JapanISSN
1341-1268Language
engNotes
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.auPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2006, Japan Society of Civil EngineersUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC