The doctrine of rights has become part of private law jurisprudence. In this article the application of the doctrine in two decisions dealing with surface support in mineral law is examined. It is argued that the decision of Kriegler J in Elektrisiteitsvoorsieningskommissie v Fourie, namely, that the right to surface support is an entitlement, is more correct than Anglo Operations Ltd v Sandhurst Estates (Pty) Ltd in which it was decided that the right to surface support is a competence. It is submitted that depending on the legal location of the entitlement in the relationship between owner and miner of land one may simply refer to either an owner's entitlement to surface support or a miner's entitlement to undertake opencast-cast mining.
History
Journal
Obiter
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pagination
539 - 553
Publisher
Faculty of Law, University of Port Elizabeth
Location
Port Elizabeth, South Africa
ISSN
1682-5853
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice
2006, University of Port Elizabeth, Faculty of Law