Version 2 2024-06-17, 07:06Version 2 2024-06-17, 07:06
Version 1 2014-10-28, 09:01Version 1 2014-10-28, 09:01
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 07:06authored byM McGillivray
There is a widespread view that political criteria have received less emphasis in aid allocation since the end of the cold war, with a greater share of aid subsequently being based on developmental criteria. An observed increase in aid effectiveness is attributed to this shift. A reasonably large literature on aid allocation supports this view: a number of influential, widely cited studies conclude that developmental criteria played no role in the 1970s and 1980s inter-recipient aid allocation. This paper argues that the shift is not as significant as commonly thought. It points to a number of methodological weaknesses in the dominant modelling approach used within the literature, showing that more rigorous econometric methods suggest that developmental criteria have had a larger influence on cold war period aid allocation than previously thought. An alternative interpretation of the observed increase in aid effectiveness is provided.
History
Journal
Journal of Economic Development
Volume
28
Pagination
171-188
Location
Seoul, Korea
Open access
Yes
ISSN
0254-8372
Language
eng
Publication classification
C3.1 Non-refereed articles in a professional journal