Monitoring methods influence native predator detectability and inferred occupancy responses to introduced carnivore management
Version 2 2024-06-14, 22:48Version 2 2024-06-14, 22:48
Version 1 2022-11-22, 05:07Version 1 2022-11-22, 05:07
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-14, 22:48 authored by Tim S Jessop, Graeme R GillespieMonitoring methods influence native predator detectability and inferred occupancy responses to introduced carnivore management
History
Journal
Wildlife ResearchLocation
Melbourne, Vic.Publisher DOI
ISSN
1035-3712eISSN
1448-5494Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalPublisher
CSIRO PublishingUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
AUSTRALIAbiodiversity monitoringdetection method evaluationdetection probabilityEcologyEnvironmental Sciences & EcologyFOX CONTROLIMPACTlace monitorlethal fox baitingLife Sciences & Biomedicinemanagement inferenceMESOPREDATOR RELEASEMULTIPLERED FOXREPTILESScience & Technologysite occupancySITE OCCUPANCYSPATIAL ECOLOGYVaranus variusVULPES-VULPESZoologySchool of Life and Environmental SciencesCentre for Integrative EcologyFaculty of Science Engineering and Built Environment
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC