File(s) under permanent embargo

Moving Beyond the Common Law Objection to Structured Proportionality

journal contribution
posted on 2021-03-01, 00:00 authored by Anne CarterAnne Carter
This article examines the claim that the adoption of structured proportionality testing in Australian constitutional review is ill-suited to Australia’s common law tradition. That objection has been stated by some members of the High Court and scholars, though the precise basis of the objection has not been clearly articulated. This article clarifies and evaluates this objection, setting out a number of distinct concerns which emerge from the reasoning of the minority justices. Ultimately, the article argues that the objection has been too starkly cast and that Australia’s common law tradition does not present an insurmountable obstacle to the introduction of proportionality testing in constitutional review.

History

Journal

Federal Law Review

Volume

49

Issue

1

Pagination

73 - 95

Publisher

SAGE Publications

ISSN

0067-205X

eISSN

1444-6928

Language

en

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal article

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Exports