Deakin University
Browse

Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: Protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation

Download (470.34 kB)
Version 4 2024-10-20, 00:01
Version 3 2024-06-18, 07:08
Version 2 2024-06-06, 07:59
Version 1 2018-04-20, 11:49
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-20, 00:01 authored by Ian D Graham, Anita Kothari, Chris McCutcheon, Gonzalo Alvarez, Davina Banner, Mari BottiMari Botti, Tracey BucknallTracey Bucknall, Ingrid Botting, Julie ConsidineJulie Considine, Maxine DukeMaxine Duke, Sandra Dunn, Trisha Dunning, Anna Gagliardi, Heather Gainforth, Wendy Gifford, Karen Harlos, Tanya Horsley, Alison HutchinsonAlison Hutchinson, Monika Kastner, Sara Kreindler, Linda Li, Martha MacLeod, Elizabeth Manias, Jonathan Mitchell, Theresa Montini, Smita Pakhale, Mark Pearson, Bodil RasmussenBodil Rasmussen, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Nancy Salbach, Jonathan Salsberg, Shannon Sibbald, Kathryn Sibley, Dawn Stacey, Harriette Van Spall, Margaret Watson, Anna Williamson, David K Wright, Euson Yeung, Emily Jenkins, Sayna Bahrani, Fraser Bell, Laura Boland, Clayon Hamilton, Janet Jull, Jesse Leese, Graham MacDonald, Robert KD McLean, Kelly Mrklas, Tram Nguyen, Katrina Plamondon, Danielle Rolfe, Katherine Salter, Brianne Wood, Ilja Ormel, Maria Zych, Donna Angus, Beth Beaupre, Krista Connell, Jeanette Edwards, Shannon Fenton, Michelle Gagnon, Kathryn Graham, Mary Elizabeth Harriman, Michael Hillmer, Bev Holmes, Russell Ives, Ian Jones, Karen Lee, Ainslie Mihalchuk, Michelle McEvoy, Wendy Nicklin, Mary Ann O'Brien, Patrick Odnokon, Sheldon Permack, Shannon Rogalski, Hélène Sabourin, Yves Savoie, Gayle Scarrow, Robert Sheldon, Ann Sprague, Anthony Tang, Cathy Ulrich, Pam Valentine, Christina Weise, George Wells, Brock Wright, Jamie Brehaut, Melissa Brouwers, Christina Godfrey, Jeremy Grimshaw, John Lavis, France Legare, David Moher, Justin Presseau, Janet Squires, Sharon Straus, Jimmy Volmink, Susan Law, Anne Lyddiatt, Jacqueline Tetroe
© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Health research is conducted with the expectation that it advances knowledge and eventually translates into improved health systems and population health. However, research findings are often caught in the know-do gap: they are not acted upon in a timely way or not applied at all. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is advanced as a way to increase the relevance, applicability and impact of research. With IKT, knowledge users work with researchers throughout the research process, starting with identification of the research question. Knowledge users represent those who would be able to use research results to inform their decisions (e.g. clinicians, managers, policy makers, patients/families and others). Stakeholders are increasingly interested in the idea that IKT generates greater and faster societal impact. Stakeholders are all those who are interested in the use of research results but may not necessarily use them for their own decision-making (e.g. governments, funders, researchers, health system managers and policy makers, patients and clinicians). Although IKT is broadly accepted, the actual research supporting it is limited and there is uncertainty about how best to conduct and support IKT. This paper presents a protocol for a programme of research testing the assumption that engaging the users of research in phases of its production leads to (a) greater appreciation of and capacity to use research; (b) the production of more relevant, useful and applicable research that results in greater impact; and (c) conditions under which it is more likely that research results will influence policy, managerial and clinical decision-making. Methods: The research programme will adopt an interdisciplinary, international, cross-sector approach, using multiple and mixed methods to reflect the complex and social nature of research partnerships. We will use ongoing and future natural IKT experiments as multiple cases to study IKT in depth, and we will take advantage of the team's existing relationships with provincial, national and international organizations. Case studies will be retrospective and prospective, and the 7-year grant period will enable longitudinal studies. The initiation of partnerships, funding processes, the research lifecycle and then outcomes/impacts post project will be studied in real time. These living laboratories will also allow testing of strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the IKT approach. Discussion: This is the first interdisciplinary, systematic and programmatic research study on IKT. The research will provide scientific evidence on how to reliably and validly measure collaborative research partnerships and their impacts. The proposed research will build the science base for IKT, assess its relationship with research use and identify best practices and appropriate conditions for conducting IKT to achieve the greatest impact. It will also train and mentor the next generation of IKT researchers.

History

Journal

Implementation Science

Volume

13

Article number

ARTN 22

Location

England

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1748-5908

eISSN

1748-5908

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2018, The Authors

Issue

1

Publisher

BMC