Mythmaking in management education: the case of the AGSM (1976-1986)
Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:06Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:06
Version 1 2019-07-12, 15:39Version 1 2019-07-12, 15:39
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 07:06 authored by CM Adam, R Collins, D Dunphy, Philip YettonPhilip YettonThis article shows how an organisation may rapidly adopt a ruling myth as an entire construct with the support of the organisational elite, and then as swiftly abandon it as the organisation's ruling myth when the elite finds it produces a performance loss measured in the external environment. Our evidence is based on a detailed study of the start-up phase of the Australian Graduate School of Management (AGSM) from its foundation in 1976. Our analytical method emerges from a dynamic model of organisation operation and adjustment recently proposed in the corporate strategy field. The principal findings suggest that researchers on organisational myths, as well as management educators and their clients, should be sensitive to alternative forms of myth development, and should be specially careful in using the traditional “life-cycle” models of myth creation[1]. The life-cycle models portray myth development and abandonment as gradual evolutionary processes. Our article points to a more disjointed process of mythmaking. © 1988, MCB UP Limited
History
Journal
Journal of management developmentVolume
7Pagination
39-52Location
Bingley, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0262-1711Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
1988, MCB UP LimitedIssue
2Publisher
Emerald PublishingUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC