Deakin University
Browse
loughan-neuroscientificexplanations-2018.pdf (1.03 MB)

Neuroscientific explanations and the stigma of mental disorder: a meta-analytic study

Download (1.03 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-01-01, 00:00 authored by Amy Loughman, Nick Haslam
Genetic and other biological explanations appear to have mixed blessings for the stigma of mental disorder. Meta-analytic evidence shows that these "biogenetic" explanations reduce the blame attached to sufferers, but they also increase aversion, perceptions of dangerousness, and pessimism about recovery. These relationships may arise because biogenetic explanations recruit essentialist intuitions, which have known associations with prejudice and the endorsement of stereotypes. However, the adverse implications of biogenetic explanations as a set may not hold true for the subset of those explanations that invoke neurobiological causes. Neurobiological explanations might have less adverse implications for stigma than genetic explanations, for example, because they are arguably less essentialist. Although this possibility is important for evaluating the social implications of neuroscientific explanations of mental health problems, it has yet to be tested meta-analytically. We present meta-analyses of links between neurobiological explanations and multiple dimensions of stigma in 26 correlational and experimental studies. In correlational studies, neurobiological explanations were marginally associated with greater desire for social distance from people with mental health problems. In experimental studies, these explanations were associated with greater desire for social distance, greater perceived dangerousness, and greater prognostic pessimism. Neurobiological explanations were not linked to reduced blame in either set of studies. By implication, neurobiological explanations have the same adverse links to stigma as other forms of biogenetic explanation. These findings raise troubling implications about the public impact of psychiatric neuroscience research findings. Although such findings are not intrinsically stigmatizing, they may become so when viewed through the lens of neuroessentialism.

History

Journal

Cognitive research: Principles and implications

Volume

3

Issue

1

Article number

43

Pagination

1 - 12

Publisher

Springer

Location

Berlin, Germany

eISSN

2365-7464

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal