Version 2 2024-06-06, 12:04Version 2 2024-06-06, 12:04
Version 1 2017-04-12, 10:49Version 1 2017-04-12, 10:49
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-06, 12:04authored byW Yao, T Kam, F Vahid
We simulate synthetic data from known data generating processes (DGPs) that arise from economic
theory, and compare the performance of fitted VAR and VARMA models in estimating the true impulse
responses to structural shocks. We show that while the VARMA structures implied by these DGPs are
theoretically identified and lead to precise estimates of impulse responses given enough data, their
parameters are close to the non-identified ridge in the parameter space, and that makes precise estimation
of the impulse responses in small samples typical of macroeconomic data improbable. As a result, VARMA
models barely show any advantage over VARs in characterizing the known DGPs in small samples. This is
a refinement of the conjecture that near non-stationarity, near non-invertibility or weak identification
could be possible reasons for the failure of structural VARMA models in providing good estimates of
theoretical impulse responses of particular DSGE models.