Deakin University
Browse

Optimising database searching in pharmacy education

Version 3 2024-06-14, 10:29
Version 2 2024-06-05, 08:49
Version 1 2023-02-12, 21:55
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-14, 10:29 authored by Denise L Hope, Gary D Grant, Gary RogersGary Rogers, Michelle A King
Abstract Objectives To determine the effectiveness of databases in a pharmacy education literature search. Methods Six databases (CINAHL, ERIC, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Direct and Scopus) were compared for effectiveness in identifying pharmacy education literature. Articles were coded for database of retrieval and results cross-referenced. Sensitivity, precision and number of unique retrievals were calculated. Key findings Scopus yielded the highest sensitivity (65%) and precision (47%). The combination of three databases (Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar) identified 97% (n = 64) of 66 relevant articles. Conclusions Pharmacy education literature searches require more than one database, ideally Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar.

History

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE

Volume

30

Pagination

580-582

Location

England

ISSN

0961-7671

eISSN

2042-7174

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

6

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC