Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Overcoming challenges in conducting systematic reviews in implementation science: a methods commentary

Version 3 2024-06-19, 19:50
Version 2 2024-06-02, 22:56
Version 1 2023-07-28, 05:09
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-19, 19:50 authored by Anna ChapmanAnna Chapman, NM Rankin, Hannah JongebloedHannah Jongebloed, Serene YoongSerene Yoong, Vicki WhiteVicki White, Trish LivingstonTrish Livingston, Alison HutchinsonAlison Hutchinson, Anna UgaldeAnna Ugalde
AbstractConsolidation of the literature using systematic reviews is a critical way to advance a discipline and support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare. However, unique challenges exist that impact the conduct of systematic reviews in implementation science. In this commentary, we reflect on our combined experience to describe five key challenges unique to systematic reviews of primary implementation research. These challenges include (1) descriptors used in implementation science publications, (2) distinction between evidence-based interventions and implementation strategies, (3) assessment of external validity, (4) synthesis of implementation studies with substantial clinical and methodological diversity, and (5) variability in defining implementation ‘success’. We outline possible solutions and highlight resources that can be used by authors of primary implementation research, as well as systematic review and editorial teams, to overcome the identified challenges and optimise the utility of future systematic reviews in implementation science.

History

Journal

Systematic Reviews

Volume

12

Article number

ARTN 116

Pagination

1-6

Location

London, Eng.

ISSN

2046-4053

eISSN

2046-4053

Language

eng

Publication classification

C4 Letter or note

Issue

1

Publisher

BMC

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC