Performances of rainfall-runoff models calibrated over single and continuous storm flow events
Version 2 2024-06-03, 22:48Version 2 2024-06-03, 22:48
Version 1 2017-08-01, 14:45Version 1 2017-08-01, 14:45
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 22:48 authored by SBK Tan, Lloyd ChuaLloyd Chua, EB Shuy, EYM Lo, LM LimAccurate parameter estimation is important for reliable rainfall-runoff modeling. Previous studies emphasize that a sufficient length of continuous events is required for model calibration to overcome the effect of initial conditions. This paper investigates the feasibility of calibrating rainfall-runoff models over a number of limited storm flow events. For a subcatchment having a moderate influence from initial soil moisture conditions, this study shows that rainfall-runoff models could still be calibrated reliably over a set of representative events provided that the events cover a wide range of peak flow, total runoff volume, and initial soil moisture conditions. This approach could provide an alternative calibration strategy for a small watershed that has a limited data length but consists of runoff events with a wide range of magnitudes. Compared to continuous-event calibration, event-based calibration appears to perform better in simulating the overall shape of hydrograph, peak flow and time to peak. However, continuous-event calibration was found to be more reliable in providing runoff volume, suggesting that continuous-event calibration should still be used when runoff volume is the main concern of a study. © 2008 ASCE.
History
Journal
Journal of Hydrologic EngineeringVolume
13Pagination
597-607ISSN
1084-0699Publication classification
CN.1 Other journal articleCopyright notice
2008, American Society of Civil EngineersIssue
7Publisher
American Society of Civil EngineersUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC