Deakin University
Browse

Progression of Transdiagnostic Stages From Childhood to Young Adulthood

journal contribution
posted on 2025-11-27, 01:57 authored by Aswin Ratheesh, Yufan Chen, Dylan Hammond, Zoe Aitken, Jai Shah, Frank Iorfino, Jan Scott, Ian Hickie, Chris Davey, Andrew Chanen, Michael BerkMichael Berk, Patrick McGorry, Steven Marwaha, Andrew Thompson, Barnaby Nelson
ImportanceTransdiagnostic clinical staging models for mental disorders are receiving increased attention. However, their underlying assumptions are underresearched; for example, it is not clear whether the observed progression across stages occurs independently of preexisting risk factors.ObjectivesTo test the likelihood of progression from stage 0 (familial risk) in childhood to stage 1a (mild symptoms) in adolescence and subsequently to stage 1b (clinically significant symptoms) in young adulthood, accounting for confounders, and to explore potential mediators.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study included participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). ALSPAC included pregnant women and their offspring residing in Avon, United Kingdom, between 1991 and 1992, with a proportion of offspring followed up into young adulthood. Eligible participants provided data on stage determinants and potential confounders from birth until age 24 years. Data were collected from 1991 to 2015 and analyzed from January 2002 to June 2025.ExposuresExposures were clinical stages 0 and 1a in separate tests of association with stages 1a and 1b, respectively. Criteria for stage 0 were the presence of schizophrenia or severe depression in a first-degree relative. Criteria for stage 1a were the presence of 1 to 2 symptoms of depression, anxiety, or psychosis at ages 12 to 13 years.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOutcomes were stage 1a in adolescence and stage 1b in young adulthood. Criteria for stage 1b were at least moderate symptoms of depression, anxiety, or psychosis, with associated functional impact at ages 18 to 24 years. Confounders were sex assigned at birth, obstetric risk, parental social class, ethnicity, family adversity, temperament, early life events, and neurocognition, measured in childhood.ResultsAmong those with complete data at all 3 time points (1375 participants; weighted, 7342), 796 participants (57.9%; weighted, 51.5%) were female and 579 (42.1%; weighted, 48.5%) were male. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was an association between stage 0 in childhood and stage 1a in adolescence (3860 participants; weighted, 7388 participants; odds ratio [OR], 1.65, 95% CI, 1.30-2.11) and between stage 1a in adolescence and stage 1b in young adulthood (1661 participants; weighted, 7466 participants; OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.07-4.01). Level of neuroticism in adolescence mediated 18% of the association between stage 1a in adolescence and stage 1b in young adulthood.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, young people with mental health problems meeting criteria for early clinical stages were at heightened risk of developing subsequent stages, independent of early life risk factors. This study supports the assumption of progression underlying clinical staging models for mental disorders.<p></p>

Funding

Funder: Society for Mental Health Research

Funder: National Health and Medical Research Council

History

Related Materials

Location

United States

Open access

  • No

Language

eng

Journal

Jama Psychiatry

Volume

82

Pagination

1113-1122

ISSN

2168-622X

eISSN

2168-6238

Issue

11

Publisher

American Medical Association