File(s) under permanent embargo
Projecting the performance of conservation interventions
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-01, 00:00 authored by E A Law, P J Ferraro, P Arcese, Brett BryanBrett Bryan, K Davis, A Gordon, M H Holden, G Iacona, R Marcos Martinez, C A McAlpine, J R Rhodes, J S Sze, K A WilsonSuccessful decision-making for environmental management requires evidence of the performance and efficacy of
proposed conservation interventions. Projecting the future impacts of prospective conservation policies and
programs is challenging due to a range of complex ecological, economic, social and ethical factors, and in
particular the need to extrapolate models to novel contexts. Yet many extrapolation techniques currently employed
are limited by unfounded assumptions of causality and a reliance on potentially biased inferences drawn
from limited data. We show how these restrictions can be overcome by established and emerging techniques
from causal inference, scenario analysis, systematic review, expert elicitation, and global sensitivity analysis.
These technical advances provide avenues to untangle cause from correlation, evaluate and transfer models
between contexts, characterize uncertainty, and address imperfect data. With more rigorous projections of
prospective performance of interventions, scientists can deliver policy and program advice that is more scientifically
credible.
proposed conservation interventions. Projecting the future impacts of prospective conservation policies and
programs is challenging due to a range of complex ecological, economic, social and ethical factors, and in
particular the need to extrapolate models to novel contexts. Yet many extrapolation techniques currently employed
are limited by unfounded assumptions of causality and a reliance on potentially biased inferences drawn
from limited data. We show how these restrictions can be overcome by established and emerging techniques
from causal inference, scenario analysis, systematic review, expert elicitation, and global sensitivity analysis.
These technical advances provide avenues to untangle cause from correlation, evaluate and transfer models
between contexts, characterize uncertainty, and address imperfect data. With more rigorous projections of
prospective performance of interventions, scientists can deliver policy and program advice that is more scientifically
credible.
History
Journal
Biological conservationVolume
215Article number
CPagination
142 - 151Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
0006-3207Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2017, ElsevierUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
casual inferenceevidence-based policypolicy evaluationpredictionprojectiontransportabilityScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineBiodiversity ConservationEcologyEnvironmental SciencesBiodiversity & ConservationEnvironmental Sciences & EcologyCausal inferenceECOSYSTEM SERVICESHABITAT LOSSBIODIVERSITYKNOWLEDGEIMPACTSEXTINCTIONPOVERTYSYSTEMSBIASES
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC