Quantification of spatial and thematic uncertainty in the application of underwater video for benthic habitat mapping
Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:36Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:36
Version 1 2015-02-19, 16:38Version 1 2015-02-19, 16:38
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 07:36 authored by A Rattray, Daniel IerodiaconouDaniel Ierodiaconou, J Monk, LJB Laurenson, P KennedyThis study presents an analysis of the application of underwater video data collected for training and validating benthic habitat distribution models. Specifically, we quantify the two major sources of error pertaining to collection of this type of reference data. A theoretical spatial error budget is developed for a positioning system used to co-register video frames to their corresponding locations at the seafloor. Second, we compare interpretation variability among trained operators assessing the same video frames between times over three hierarchical levels of a benthic classification scheme. Propagated error in the positioning system described was found to be highly correlated with depth of operation and varies from 1.5m near the surface to 5.7m in 100m of water. In order of decreasing classification hierarchy, mean overall observer agreement was found to be 98% (range 6%), 82% (range 12%) and 75% (range 17%) for the 2, 4, and 6 class levels of the scheme, respectively. Patterns in between-observer variation are related to the level of detail imposed by each hierarchical level of the classification scheme, the feature of interest, and to the amount of observer experience. © 2014 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
History
Journal
Marine geodesyVolume
37Pagination
315-336Location
London, Eng.ISSN
0149-0419eISSN
1521-060XLanguage
engPublication classification
C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalIssue
3Publisher
Taylor & FrancisUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC