Deakin University
Browse

Randomised trial of genetic testing and targeted intervention to prevent the development and progression of Paget’s disease of bone

Download (1.28 MB)
Version 4 2025-05-15, 06:03
Version 3 2025-05-15, 06:03
Version 2 2024-05-31, 18:30
Version 1 2024-01-04, 03:46
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-15, 06:03 authored by Jonathan Phillips, Deepak Subedi, Steff C Lewis, Catriona Keerie, Owen Cronin, Mary Porteous, David Moore, Roseanne Cetnarskyj, Lakshminarayan Ranganath, Peter L Selby, Tolga Turgut, Geeta Hampson, Rama Chandra, Shu Ho, Jon Tobias, Steven Young-Min, Malachi J McKenna, Rachel K Crowley, William D Fraser, Jonathan CY Tang, Luigi Gennari, Rannuccio Nuti, Maria Luisa Brandi, Javier Del Pino-Montes, Jean-Pierre Devogelaer, Anne Durnez, Giovanni Carlo Isaia, Marco Di Stefano, Nuria Guanabens, Josep Blanch Rubio, Markus J Seibel, John P Walsh, Sarah L Rea, Mark A Kotowicz, Geoffrey C Nicholson, Emma L Duncan, Gabor Major, Anne Horne, Nigel Gilchrist, Stuart H Ralston
IntroductionPaget’s disease of bone (PDB) frequently presents at an advanced stage with irreversible skeletal damage. Clinical outcomes might be improved by earlier diagnosis and prophylactic treatment.MethodsWe randomised 222 individuals at increased risk of PDB because of pathogenicSQSTM1variants to receive 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo. The primary outcome was new bone lesions assessed by radionuclide bone scan. Secondary outcomes included change in existing lesions, biochemical markers of bone turnover and skeletal events related to PDB.ResultsThe median duration of follow-up was 84 months (range 0–127) and 180 participants (81%) completed the study. At baseline, 9 (8.1%) of the ZA group had PDB lesions vs 12 (10.8%) of the placebo group. Two of the placebo group developed new lesions versus none in the ZA group (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.00 to 3.43, p=0.25). Eight of the placebo group had a poor outcome (lesions which were new, unchanged or progressing) compared with none of the ZA group (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.42, p=0.003). At the study end, 1 participant in the ZA group had lesions compared with 11 in the placebo group. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were significantly reduced in the ZA group. One participant allocated to placebo required rescue therapy with ZA because of symptomatic disease. The number and severity of adverse events did not differ between groups.ConclusionsGenetic testing for pathogenicSQSTM1variants coupled with intervention with ZA is well tolerated and has favourable effects on the progression of early PDB.Trial registration numberISRCTN11616770.

History

Journal

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volume

83

Pagination

529-536

Location

London, Eng.

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

0003-4967

eISSN

1468-2060

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

4

Publisher

BMJ

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC